The headline numbers

Where the 2026 convention stands

Satisfied with 2026
90%
19 of 21 answered (9 very satisfied)
Would recommend (9-10)
56%
14 of 25 on the 0-10 scale
Would recommend 56%On the fence 40%Would not 4%
First-time attendees
36%
9 of 25 
Planning to return in 2027
56%
14 yes, 11 unsure

The full 2026 convention debrief

Key takeaways

  1. 1

    Of the 25 attendees 14 said they'll be back next year and 11 said they weren't sure. Nobody said no.

  2. 2

    19 of 21 attendees who rated the event said they were satisfied or very satisfied. The written comments are less flattering. 

  3. 3

    First-time attendees were the single largest experience group in the 2026 survey. The mentoring round-tables and career-stage cohorts attendees asked for by name are what convert a first-timer into a repeat attendee.

  4. 4

    Attendees said the strongest breakouts were scheduled against each other so they had to pick 2 of 6 they wanted to see, and they asked by name for the Young Professional / Mid-Level / Senior round-tables from Orlando 2025 to return.

At a glance

Total responses
100.0%25/25
Completed debriefs
Satisfied or very satisfied
90.5%19/21
9 very satisfied
Strong recommenders (9-10)
56.0%14/25
Planning to attend 2027
56.0%14/25
11 unsure
First-time attendees
36.0%9/25
On the fence (7-8)
40.0%10/25
Passives
Unsure for 2027
44.0%11/25
No hard no's
Would not recommend (0-6)
4.0%1/25

Convention satisfaction

\n

Satisfied or very satisfied
90%
19 of 21
Very satisfied
43%
9 of 21
Responses
21
out of 25 debriefs
Satisfied10 · 47.6%
Very satisfied9 · 42.9%
Neither satisfied nor dissatisfied2 · 9.5%

Would you recommend the convention?

\n

Strong recommenders (9-10)
56%
14 of 25
On the fence (7-8)
40%
10 of 25
Low scores (0-6)
4%
1 of 25
Promoters (9-10)14 · 56.0%
Passives (7-8)10 · 40.0%
Detractors (0-6)1 · 4.0%

Attendee experience

How many NACMA Conventions attendees have attended

This was my first one!9 · 36.0%
7-10 conventions5 · 20.0%
11+ conventions5 · 20.0%
2-3 conventions4 · 16.0%
4-6 conventions2 · 8.0%

First-timer share

First-time attendees9 · 36.0%
Returning attendees16 · 64.0%

2027 convention plans

Yes14 · 56.0%
Not sure (please specify)11 · 44.0%

Who attended

Position level

Associate AD5 · 20.0%
Assistant Director5 · 20.0%
Director4 · 16.0%
Assistant AD4 · 16.0%
GA/Student/Intern3 · 12.0%
Other (please specify)2 · 8.0%
Deputy AD1 · 4.0%
CRO1 · 4.0%

Who paid for convention

My institution covered 100% of the cost10 · 40.0%
A combination of a stipend and my institution covered costs8 · 32.0%
My stipend covered 100% of the cost5 · 20.0%
A combination of a stipend and on my own covered costs2 · 8.0%

\n

\n

Programming skews too heavily to big-school and NIL
8 mentions · 26%

The loudest theme. Smaller-school and non-D-I members say the panels solve problems they don't have. When most of the speakers on stage are from Power 4 schools, the advice lands as out of reach. NIL comes up as over-represented even in sessions that weren't billed as NIL.

  • "It would be helpful if things were split up by the size of your school. Bigger schools do things smaller schools don't have the resources for."
  • "A lot of the panels had 2 P4 schools and one G6. A lot of the advice was out of touch for smaller schools with smaller budgets."
  • "Programming seemed very heavy towards a few select topics and a lot of that was only applied for larger schools."
Attendees want to see more sessions than the schedule allows
6 mentions · 19%

Breakouts and professional-development sessions were stacked at the same time, so attendees had to pick 2 out of 6 things they wanted to see. Repeating popular sessions or spacing them out better came up more than once.

  • "The breakouts felt grouped in a way where I was unable to go to all of the sessions I was most interested in — they were all at the same time."
  • "If there is a way to add more breakout and programming sessions that repeat or find a way to break them up better, that would be helpful."
  • "More programming on the final day of Convention and the return of segmented programming on day one."
Bring back the young-professional round-tables
5 mentions · 16%

Multiple young-professional attendees asked for the small-group Young Professional, Mid-Level, and Senior cohorts that ran at Orlando 2025 — by name. They rated it the highest-value networking format of that convention.

  • "Bring back the round table small group discussion for the YP, Mid Level, and Senior Level cohorts, like there was in Orlando 2025. As a YP, I found it immensely beneficial."
  • "A panel of seasoned vets sharing advice or even full-time employees who've only been in their role for 1-3 years who can also share tips."
  • "I think more for folks that are new to the industry, maybe like an intro session before the event starts."
The networking is the product
4 mentions · 13%

When attendees describe what convention gave them, they almost never name a specific session — they name a conversation. That matches the row-level data: 95% of attendees rate the peer network Critical or Very important.

  • "The network opportunities are extremely powerful."
  • "Everyone is struggling on their campuses and need support. Peers stepped up to support one another with best practices."
  • "I always leave NACMA with new relationships and ideas."
Sessions members want next year
8 mentions · 26%

The specific asks: fan-experience deep-dives, digital marketing measurement, an AI workshop (not another talk), mid-major revenue playbooks, and a career session on moving from a smaller school to a bigger one.

  • "I would like to see more speakers from G6 / mid-major schools."
  • "A session specifically devoted to optimizing digital marketing from start to finish, including tracking open rates and ROI."
  • "I thought the AI session was good. I would have loved it in a workshop format so we could follow along."

Attendee comments

Showing 64 comments from 4 sections

Four key takeaways from the 2026 convention

14 of 25 attendees are coming back in 2027

56% saying yes11 unsure0 hard no's

Of the 25 attendees 14 said they'll be back next year and 11 said they weren't sure. Nobody said no.

What we can do next

Personal outreach from the convention committee to each of the unsure attendees before 2027 sign-up opens. Ask what would move them to a yes. Publish a 2027 preview page they can point to when asking for institutional approval.

Attendees were satisfied, but the mid-major voice is missing

90% satisfied or very satisfied9 very satisfiedTop open-ended theme: small-school gap

19 of 21 attendees who rated the event said they were satisfied or very satisfied. The written comments are less flattering. 

What we can do next

Add a dedicated mid-major and small-school programming track for 2027 with speakers who work in those departments. Audit each 2027 panel for at least one G6 or small-school representative.

9 of 25 attendees were at their first convention

36% first-timers9 attendeesLargest single group in the debrief

First-time attendees were the single largest experience group in the 2026 survey. The mentoring round-tables and career-stage cohorts attendees asked for by name are what convert a first-timer into a repeat attendee.

What we can do next

For 2027, ship a deliberate first-timer track: a pre-convention orientation, a matched buddy from a returning attendee, and priority spots in the Young Professional round-tables.

Attendees named the schedule and the round-tables as the top fixes

0 mentions: breakout conflicts5 mentions: bring back round-tables4 mentions: networking time

Attendees said the strongest breakouts were scheduled against each other so they had to pick 2 of 6 they wanted to see, and they asked by name for the Young Professional / Mid-Level / Senior round-tables from Orlando 2025 to return.

What we can do next

Before 2027 programming is locked, audit the breakout grid for direct conflicts between the highest-demand sessions, and put the career-stage round-tables back on the schedule as a named track.